JK
>ŁADOWANIE // ŁADOWANIE
INICJALIZACJA WIDOKU
Architektura mikroserwisów z NestJS, PostgreSQL i Dockerem zintegrowana przez centralną bramę API Gateway.
Rozdzielenie routingu (API Gateway), logiki domenowej (niezależne serwisy) i bazy danych w celu autonomicznego wdrażania i skalowania.
| Technologia | Wersja | Cel | Dlaczego wybrano |
|---|---|---|---|
| TypeScript | ^5.7.3 | Primary language for all services | Type safety, NestJS ecosystem standard |
| NestJS | ^11.0.1 | Application framework | Modular architecture, dependency injection, TypeScript-first |
| TypeORM | ^0.3.27 | ORM for PostgreSQL access | Active Record/Repository pattern, NestJS integration |
| PostgreSQL | 15 | Primary database | JSONB support, ACID compliance, reliability |
| Docker | — | Containerization for all services | Consistent environments, reproducible deployments |
| Turborepo | ^2.5.8 | Monorepo task orchestration | Fast parallel builds, caching, npm workspaces integration |
| GitHub Actions | — | CI/CD pipeline execution | Free for public repos, tight Git integration |
| Jest | ^30.0.0 | Unit testing framework | NestJS default, snapshot support |
| Swagger | ^11.2.0 | API documentation | Auto-generates OpenAPI from decorators |
| Metoda | Trasa | Cel |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /products | List all products |
| GET | /products/:id | Get product by ID |
| POST | /products | Create product |
| PATCH | /products/:id | Update product |
| DELETE | /products/:id | Delete product |
| GET | /orders | List all orders |
| GET | /orders/:id | Get order by ID |
| POST | /orders | Create order |
| Metoda | Trasa | Cel |
|---|---|---|
| POST | /products | Create product |
| GET | /products | List all products |
| GET | /products/:id | Get product by ID |
| PATCH | /products/:id | Update product |
| DELETE | /products/:id | Delete product |
| Metoda | Trasa | Cel |
|---|---|---|
| POST | /orders | Create order |
| GET | /orders | List all orders |
| GET | /orders/:id | Get order by ID |
| Kolumna | Typ | Uwagi |
|---|---|---|
| idPK | SERIAL | Auto-generated primary key |
| code | VARCHAR | Product SKU/code |
| name | VARCHAR | Product display name |
| description | VARCHAR | Product description |
| price | DECIMAL | Product price |
| image | VARCHAR | Image URL |
No explicit indexes beyond primary key. No unique constraints on code.
| Kolumna | Typ | Uwagi |
|---|---|---|
| idPK | SERIAL | Auto-generated primary key |
| customer | JSONB | Stores {name, phone} |
| products | JSONB | Array of {id, name, rate, qty} |
| totalAmount | DECIMAL | Total order amount |
Products stored as JSONB snapshot — intentional denormalization. No foreign keys to product table.
No foreign key relationships. Order.products is a JSONB snapshot — orders are self-contained records that do not reference the product table. Product price changes do not affect existing orders.
Decyzja: Both services connect to the same PostgreSQL instance and database (procura_db)
Dlaczego: Simplifies development and deployment — one database to manage
Korzyści: Simpler infrastructure, lower resource usage, easier local development
Kompromisy: Violates database-per-service principle, creates hidden coupling, makes independent scaling harder
Decyzja: Order entity stores product data as JSONB rather than foreign key references
Dlaczego: Decouples order data from product lifecycle — orders are immutable snapshots
Korzyści: Orders are self-contained, product changes don't affect historical orders
Kompromisy: No referential integrity, data duplication, no automatic product validation on order creation
Decyzja: Simple static API key in x-api-key header, compared against environment variable
Dlaczego: Simplest possible authentication for demonstration purposes
Korzyści: Minimal implementation, no token management, no state
Kompromisy: No user identity, no fine-grained permissions, key is static and shared
Decyzja: API Gateway communicates with downstream services via synchronous HTTP (Axios)
Dlaczego: Simplest approach for synchronous request-response pattern
Korzyści: Easy to understand, debug, and test; standard HTTP tooling
Kompromisy: Synchronous coupling, no retry/circuit breaker, no async processing
Decyzja: Each service uses a 3-stage Dockerfile (deps → builder → runner)
Dlaczego: Minimizes final image size and attack surface
Korzyści: Production images contain only runtime dependencies and compiled code
Kompromisy: Build time for each stage, no layer caching optimization for src changes
Decyzja: Both services use synchronize: true in TypeORM config
Dlaczego: Auto-creates/updates database schema from entities during development
Korzyści: No migration files needed, schema stays in sync with code
Kompromisy: Dangerous in production — can cause data loss on schema changes