JK
>CARGANDO // CARGANDO
INICIALIZANDO VISTA
Arquitectura de microservicios con NestJS, PostgreSQL y Docker que soporta servicios de productos y pedidos a través de un API Gateway centralizado.
Demuestra una arquitectura empresarial desacoplada entre el enrutamiento (API Gateway), la lógica de dominio (servicios independientes) y la persistencia de datos (PostgreSQL), permitiendo despliegues y escalado independientes.
| Tecnología | Versión | Propósito | Por qué se eligió |
|---|---|---|---|
| TypeScript | ^5.7.3 | Primary language for all services | Type safety, NestJS ecosystem standard |
| NestJS | ^11.0.1 | Application framework | Modular architecture, dependency injection, TypeScript-first |
| TypeORM | ^0.3.27 | ORM for PostgreSQL access | Active Record/Repository pattern, NestJS integration |
| PostgreSQL | 15 | Primary database | JSONB support, ACID compliance, reliability |
| Docker | — | Containerization for all services | Consistent environments, reproducible deployments |
| Turborepo | ^2.5.8 | Monorepo task orchestration | Fast parallel builds, caching, npm workspaces integration |
| GitHub Actions | — | CI/CD pipeline execution | Free for public repos, tight Git integration |
| Jest | ^30.0.0 | Unit testing framework | NestJS default, snapshot support |
| Swagger | ^11.2.0 | API documentation | Auto-generates OpenAPI from decorators |
| Método | Ruta | Propósito |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /products | List all products |
| GET | /products/:id | Get product by ID |
| POST | /products | Create product |
| PATCH | /products/:id | Update product |
| DELETE | /products/:id | Delete product |
| GET | /orders | List all orders |
| GET | /orders/:id | Get order by ID |
| POST | /orders | Create order |
| Método | Ruta | Propósito |
|---|---|---|
| POST | /products | Create product |
| GET | /products | List all products |
| GET | /products/:id | Get product by ID |
| PATCH | /products/:id | Update product |
| DELETE | /products/:id | Delete product |
| Método | Ruta | Propósito |
|---|---|---|
| POST | /orders | Create order |
| GET | /orders | List all orders |
| GET | /orders/:id | Get order by ID |
| Columna | Tipo | Notas |
|---|---|---|
| idPK | SERIAL | Auto-generated primary key |
| code | VARCHAR | Product SKU/code |
| name | VARCHAR | Product display name |
| description | VARCHAR | Product description |
| price | DECIMAL | Product price |
| image | VARCHAR | Image URL |
No explicit indexes beyond primary key. No unique constraints on code.
| Columna | Tipo | Notas |
|---|---|---|
| idPK | SERIAL | Auto-generated primary key |
| customer | JSONB | Stores {name, phone} |
| products | JSONB | Array of {id, name, rate, qty} |
| totalAmount | DECIMAL | Total order amount |
Products stored as JSONB snapshot — intentional denormalization. No foreign keys to product table.
No foreign key relationships. Order.products is a JSONB snapshot — orders are self-contained records that do not reference the product table. Product price changes do not affect existing orders.
Decisión: Both services connect to the same PostgreSQL instance and database (procura_db)
Motivo: Simplifies development and deployment — one database to manage
Beneficios: Simpler infrastructure, lower resource usage, easier local development
Compensaciones: Violates database-per-service principle, creates hidden coupling, makes independent scaling harder
Decisión: Order entity stores product data as JSONB rather than foreign key references
Motivo: Decouples order data from product lifecycle — orders are immutable snapshots
Beneficios: Orders are self-contained, product changes don't affect historical orders
Compensaciones: No referential integrity, data duplication, no automatic product validation on order creation
Decisión: Simple static API key in x-api-key header, compared against environment variable
Motivo: Simplest possible authentication for demonstration purposes
Beneficios: Minimal implementation, no token management, no state
Compensaciones: No user identity, no fine-grained permissions, key is static and shared
Decisión: API Gateway communicates with downstream services via synchronous HTTP (Axios)
Motivo: Simplest approach for synchronous request-response pattern
Beneficios: Easy to understand, debug, and test; standard HTTP tooling
Compensaciones: Synchronous coupling, no retry/circuit breaker, no async processing
Decisión: Each service uses a 3-stage Dockerfile (deps → builder → runner)
Motivo: Minimizes final image size and attack surface
Beneficios: Production images contain only runtime dependencies and compiled code
Compensaciones: Build time for each stage, no layer caching optimization for src changes
Decisión: Both services use synchronize: true in TypeORM config
Motivo: Auto-creates/updates database schema from entities during development
Beneficios: No migration files needed, schema stays in sync with code
Compensaciones: Dangerous in production — can cause data loss on schema changes